In the previous publication on this topic it was already mentioned that the muftis, whose names are signed on the shameful «fatwa» calling aggression against Ukraine and its Muslims jihad, were confronted with the fact that it was accepted in their name (https://golosislama.com/news.php?id=40536). According to the information we have received, not only did these muftis not write this «fatwa», they did not even vote for its acceptance. They were simply confronted with the fact that their names were placed under it, and those of them who did not agree with it (of course, we are not talking about Tadjuddin, Krganov, and Berdiev) simply did not dare to question it afterwards. Such is the slavish position of Russian muftis, who cannot even control their own name in Putin’s Russia.
This once again confirms what was said earlier — such individuals cannot remain at the head of the Ummah in the future, even if they did not support what was accepted in their name. Simply because as long as such spineless collaborators of the Taghut are at the head of the Russian part of the Ummah, the situation of the Muslims will never change.
And now let’s talk about the author of this shameful «fatwa», which will undoubtedly remain a black mark in the history of Muslims in Russia. Thanks to a simple content analysis of this text and the event, we understood this at the time of writing the previous article. But now we know it on the basis of the testimony of the participants of this event.
The person who became the ideologue of both this text and this event, thus erasing all his past merits in the eyes of Muslims, is Ali Vyacheslav Polosin. A former Orthodox priest, who once did a lot to convert thousands of people to Islam, accepting financial support from the presidential administration, received through various funds and grants, he has long been attached to the ideological justification of the crimes of the Putin regime from «Islamic» positions. Previously, he did this with regard to Muslims in Syria, in particular when pro-Kremlin muftis left the World Union of Muslim Scholars after it condemned Russian aggression against Muslims in Syria. So it is not surprising that after justifying the bloody massacre against the entire Muslim Syria at that time, this scoundrel today justifies the aggression «only» against Ukraine, where Muslims are a minority.
And it all started from the moment when in 2012, together with Sergei Markus, who a few years later became an apostate and was sent to work in the Old Believer Church, he distanced himself from his former comrades in the National Organization of Russian Muslims (NORM), who realized that maintaining neutrality was no longer possible and joined anti-Putin protests and opposition movements. The superficial reasons for Polosin’s behavior are clear and not very interesting. To save his conscience, he could have left the country, as many well-known normovtsy did. But his attachment to material well-being, combined with his inability to earn a living apart from religion, finally turned the singer of monotheism and the new Russian man who rejected slavery (except before the Almighty) into a shameful slave of the most shameful taghut — the degenerating «Russian world».
It is not worthwhile to analyze quotations from this document from an Islamic perspective. After all, Vyacheslav always had problems with Islamic beliefs, and perhaps someone will try to justify his ignorance by saying that as a Russian he wanted to help his homeland. But no — he betrayed those healthy national convictions that he initially tried to combine with Islam, seeing the latter as a way to renew the Russian people.
This is what he wrote in his early book, The Straight Path to God, through which many Russians came to Islam: «Moscow, which was part of the Vladimir-Suzdal province (White Khanate), was elevated by the Khan for the special services of the Moscow princes in the mass extermination of the Russian people who revolted against the Mongols. In his zealous loyalty to the prince, he defeated not only the inhabitants of other appanage principalities, such as Tver, but also his own people. The Khan’s charter was the price for the genocide of his own people, and that is why the archetype of cruel, non-familial, non-kin, but colonial relations with its own people was formed in Moscow’s power during the process of state formation, preserved for centuries, and has remained to this day — the holy state of «Holy Russia». … Moscow has no spiritual, national-mythological and political continuity with the Russian land…
But even Moscow — the «White Khanate» — initially emerged as a democratic state: an open national liberation movement was evident under the leadership of Ivan III. However, following Vladimir, Ivan decided to impose a foreign Byzantine political mythology and ideology on the Russian people, for which he allied himself with the Palaeologans and changed his political will in favor of the latter, his Greek wife. The predictable fruit of the marriage to Sophia Palaeologus — both spiritually and politically — was Ivan the Terrible, the most authentic Byzantine on the Russian throne, the first «divine Caesar-Augustus» within the borders of the former Russian land. In a letter to Andrey Kurbsky, Ivan the Terrible proclaimed himself infallible in matters of state administration: «We have always been free to punish our serfs, we have been free to execute them». Thus the tsar replaced the image of the Almighty God and became an «earthly god» whose will could not be verified by anyone. The country became entangled in the search for the Tsar’s betrayal, a bloody frenzy that bankrupted and divided the people, which inevitably led, after a few years, to the complete destruction of the Moscow statehood…
Beginning with Nicholas I, the tsars replaced the community of free citizens, the nation, with «nationality», the state with «autocracy», and the state ideology with «Orthodoxy», which was a return to foreign pagan mythologies centered on the Byzantine absolutist idea of the «earthly God». The country increasingly resembled a vast concentration camp with millions of powerless and voiceless slaves and tens of thousands of military and religious overseers: «the land of slaves, the land of masters», this image became popular in Russian literature at the time of Alexander III and Nicholas II. Practically the entire national elite involuntarily became the opposition to the Orthodox monarchy, and its socially active part became revolutionary…
The Bolsheviks also went through a cyclical triad of development: they came to power on the wave of genuine Russian popular rule — the revived veche and councils, the restoration of representative monarchy under Stalin, and they collapsed under the weight of Gorbachev’s presidential autocracy. In a remarkable way, the same person who radically changed his appearance — Boris Yeltsin, went through the same path in just 9 years. In one of the presidential offices in the Kremlin there were four sculptures: Peter the Great, Catherine the Great, Nicholas I and Alexander III. This selection in its symbolism and historical sequence accurately characterizes the spiritual and political degradation of the occupant of the office: from the popular leadership of Peter, through the enlightened representative monarchy of Catherine, to the military despotism of the self-proclaimed God on the Russian throne, Ivan the Terrible, a terror to the peoples of the Caucasus («Nicola the Clubber», as he was called by the people), and to the prison and brigand lawlessness of a chronic drunkard, Alexander III. Whom did you serve, Vyacheslav?! After all, you once wrote such lines: «Is there any other positive political example in the historical genes of the Russian people, not related to the Byzantine-Mongol colonial legacy? There is another, national-democratic statehood in the history of the Russian land itself — in the history of the political organization of the Russian city-states before Vladimir Sviatoslavich and in the history of the Novgorod Republic in the 12th-15th centuries. … The Russian person must squeeze out the Byzantine virus of political AIDS — the virus of a slave and a servant meekly waiting for a «good tsarist fatherland». And when Rus-Ukraine chose exactly the path you dreamed of for Russia since 2014, you justified the attempt to brutally suppress it with the despotism and its slaves that you yourself condemned…
And yet you once warned against the danger of what you are now serving — the retreat «into seductive and ambitious utopias of the past, in search of ghosts of the «holy» state, irresponsible to the people, and in search of a post-Byzantine pan-Slavic CIS», which will lead to «the final destruction of both the state and Russian civilization». You wrote those lines that are particularly relevant today: «If today’s society gives its consent to the leadership of a leader without strong moral restraints, which can only be instilled by a monotheistic religion with its eternal and absolute values, then an irresponsible madman who has seized power and a «nuclear suitcase» can destroy the entire planet in an instant.
As you read all this today (and we know you will read this) and think about it, don’t you want to spit in the mirror when you look in it?