Fictional «ulemas» from 14 countries visited the occupied East Turkestan (Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region) under Chinese Communist rule and blessed the eradication of Islam in this Muslim land, calling it a policy of deradicalization and counter-terrorism. Among the visitors were representatives of the UAE Council, Al-Azhar, and the Mufti of Serbia, Mevlud Dudich. Some of them were clearly sent as state officials in the field of religion to establish Sino-Arab cooperation, while others probably went for Chinese funding.
The most painful part of this story is the involvement of the former Mufti of Bosnia and Herzegovina, Mustafa Ceric. If he were an ordinary religious prostitute, like the post-Soviet or Arab turbans, it wouldn’t cause much emotion. But this person was a member of the underground organization «Young Muslims» during the communist era, then the mufti of the Bosnian jihad and an associate of Alija Izetbegovic, and later a fighter for the rights of Muslim minorities in Europe.
A well-known hadith of the Prophet, may peace and blessings be upon him, teaches us not to be deceived by people and to judge them by the result of their actions. Mustafa Ceric’s actions are not yet complete and he still has the opportunity to repent, but it is truly remarkable how a person who started his path as a fighter and remained one for a long time, managed to destroy his reputation in just a few years and risks being remembered as a crazy political adventurer and a pawn of the most malicious forces. First, intrigues against the leading Muslim force in Bosnia and Herzegovina with ambitions to present himself as an alternative, then participation in the adventures of pro-Kremlin merchants, and finally open approval of the genocide of Muslims in East Turkestan. And this despite the fact that, unlike the government muftis, no one could have forced him to do so.
But if China’s communist policy toward the Uighurs is considered beneficial, what was the point of fighting communist Yugoslavia and fighting for the independence of Bosnia, which could have remained within it? And where is the logic in first declaring that «the Sultan of European Muslims is now in Brussels» and then going to China? We may have many complaints about Brussels, but at least no one openly accuses it of genocidal policies towards Muslims there, nor blesses it. Although it is possible that the reason for this is precisely that the «Sultan in Brussels» did not lavish money and support on the unsuccessful leader of European Muslims, against whom he decided to throw himself on the «Sultan in Beijing».
Returning to this visit itself, all that needs to be known about it can be seen in this photo: [link].
By inviting Islamic religious figures to demonstrate their policy towards Muslims, the Chinese Communist devils did not even try to create an appearance of respect for Islam in this Muslim region. How can this be understood? Simply by the fact that all the «exemplary Uyghur women» demonstrating the successes of the Chinese deradicalization policy appeared not only without hijabs, but even without basic headscarves. And the «ulemas» weren’t bothered by the fact that there wasn’t a single woman who looked Islamic at the event organized especially for them. And even if it did bother them, they did not express their dissatisfaction, but thanked their Chinese friends for their hospitality and blessed them to continue their policy.
Which is logical, because «he who feeds the girl dances with her. In this story, the Chinese Communist Party had a feast and danced with «ulemas» from 14 countries to their glory — their own, and to the dishonor and disgrace of the ulemas.