How did the «friendship of nations» come about?

When we published an article stating that Muslims should give up illusions about being able to use either the ongoing war waged by the Kremlin or its consequences in the form of the fall of the current regime to take control of the entire territory of present-day Russia (https://golosislama.com/news.php?id=41261), we did not expect it to be so convincingly illustrated by our non-friends.
The message from our Telegram channel was reposted by the well-known Russian imperialist blogger Igor Dmitriev (https://t.me/russ_orientalist/12917). And then it began. In the comments of our Telegram channel, an invasion of «dear compatriots» (not) began, outraged that Muslims dare to seriously discuss what they should strive for — to lead Russia or to separate from it. After all, they are accustomed to the idea that they should lead Russia, and the only thing Muslims can and should do is «serve the white tsar». Moreover, even some of them see it as a privilege for us, the alternative to which could be our disappearance.
In the comments over the past few days, we have seen the full range of «arguments» that Muslims in this country have to deal with throughout their lives (https://t.me/newsislamist/7230). For example, that Islam is barbarism, that Muslims are savages, and that they brought us civilization. This time they didn’t insist on «learning to pee standing up,» but instead blamed us for their alphabet, factories, hospitals, etc. Or they wrote that we shouldn’t rock the boat, but should unite against Western gays and Satanists. Or they asked in amazement who in Russia oppresses Muslims and in what way, and when someone pointed it out to them, they began to argue that this is the way it should be — if you don’t know what pork is, you can eat it in the army canteen, women don’t have to wear headscarves, and so on.
And only a few of the most reasonable wondered if it would be possible to protect the rights of all citizens in the country equally and turn it into a confederation, maybe that way it could be preserved? It could be — if such sentiments prevailed and their supporters determined the internal and external policies of this country, but the prevailing comments vividly illustrated the kind of society Muslims have to live in. And that, at the first opportunity, they should separate from it and create their own societies to clearly demonstrate who is capable of what and who is a savage. Then we can return to the conversation about who is better suited to lead whom.

2015 — 2023 ©. All rights reserved.